See how they're baiting people? Look at the time stamps. They're discussing it on their "private" message board. Trying to put all their brains together to formulate one half assed thought.
They want "proof" so they can figure out who is leaking information. They're not going to get it. I'd say "nice try", but your posts in that thread are clearly evident of your modus operandi.
Of course they're going to say the list is bull shit, they want proof, etc. I think I've posted enough proof and if you look at the FLs of the people I've linked to on CC, then look at that list that Heather posted, you'll figure it out yourselves. You all are smarter than they are.
Now watch, they'll go and DF each other so they can clean up their FLs to prove they aren't SCers. Yesirree, two steps ahead of you again chickadees.
- Mood:
giggly
After much deliberation, I’ve decided NOT to post an SC members list. I’ve received PMs from many people, some showing me examples of the SC mean girls mentality, and others claiming SC is not all about the snark and that there are innocent people on that message board.
Three of the innocent* SCers have contacted me and have made good points about why I shouldn’t come forth with a members list. I believe I would be doing a disservice to myself or to the people who have given me information if I post that information. I don’t want the people who have been sharing information with me to be compromised.
If I post a members list, how am I any better than what I’m claiming they’re doing? Why would I lower myself to that level?
Everyone snarks. That's not all that this is about. Some of the SC members have absolutely crossed the gossip line though. A few of those examples include:
- They’ve pretended to be friends with people only to take personal information out of LJs.
- Done extensive Google searches to find “dirt” on people.
- Found out peoples’ real names and home addresses and have contacted them.
- Taken personal pictures of CCers/WBTDers off of various web sites and Photoshopped them in a derogatory manner (including pregnant belly shots, family portraits, pictures of babies, pictures of CC/WBTD members, etc.).
- Called peoples’ businesses.
- Harassed people on their personal blogs, business blogs, and wedding web sites.
- Looked for certain CC posters and have ganged up and bullied them whenever they post anything. That’s not snark. That’s cyber bullying and it’s uncalled for. So what if people aren’t exactly truthful with their online personas. Is it their job to find ways to discredit people?
Those are just a few examples of why I decided to out SC in the first place.
We’re all adults. Take a look at your FLs and if there are people on there you truly don’t trust, then DF them (SC or not). The names of the more vindictive members have been mentioned. If you’re going to post something private in your LJs, use a CFG for the people you trust completely.
I’ve received several PMs from people asking me about whether certain people are SC members. Some of the names that are being thrown out are definitely not SC members, nor would they ever be. There are a handful of SC members who cause the most trouble (see bullets above) and those people have already been outed in my earlier posts or in PMs to people who they’ve ganged up on.
*I will say that I struggle when I hear there are “innocent” people on SC. How innocent are they when they know all of the above is happening, yet they still choose to be a member of that message board? Hopefully this will be a wake up call for some of them and they’ll decide to leave that board.
- Mood:
satisfied
Wait a minute... maybe Niobe is one of the SC moles. I've been receiving PMs from quite a few people, including one anonymous person. Now she's saying she's been without power? Clever set up.
- Mood:
curious
Special thanks to the person who sent me this - the link to the Suspicious Chicken message board: http://suspiciouschicken.invisionzone.co
You have mad Google skillz girl!
Since it's not a secret and since they don't snark (ha), why doncha go ahead and sign up to be a member? Let's see how many people will actually get approved. I'm thinking... hmmm... probably NO ONE. You wanna know why? Because it WAS a secret and because they DO snark. If you do get approved, they won't give you access to "The Coop". That's where the bitchy hens spend all their time snarking. Clever name, right?
Speaking of bitches, check out this thread. I'd put money on "Desperate" being an SC member. Look at the post times and how soon after "Desperate" posts, kam posts. They didn't think that one through thoroughly. Also, kam calls the OP "H". They think she's HeatherFL. How much more passive aggressive can they be? Jealous much, chickadees?
I'm working on a members list. I haven't posted it yet because unlike the heartless SC snarkers, I want to make sure I'm not going to hurt the SC innocents. Yes, there are some innocent people on that message board. I promise I'll post something this weekend.
- Mood:
good
Check out her entry about them: http://swingerwife.wordpress.com/categor
Notice her copyright infringement blurb posted in the sidebar?
- Mood:
content
Who died and made her thread police?
Cute. See how she clucks like a chicken
They really loved to rip on HeatherFL I wonder if she got a Golden Chicken Award* for this one.
Bitchy much?
Immature? Really? Kind of like being a member on a
Oooooh, yeah, yeah! And they can call it Suspicious Chicken! Oh. Wait.
Apparently she's found time to dabble in financial planning
See how they pat each other on the back?
Ha, ha, ha! I'm going to tell you to suck it because we're both Suspicious Chicken members and I can do that. I'm so cute.
Maybe she's also a mind reader? Nah, she's just a bitch.
Who needs therapy? Hmmm. Only one who would really be in dire need of therapy herself, would know this.
Keep watching! Two more posts to follow, including one introducing some of the members of Suspicious Chicken!
*When someone posts a particularly bitchy comeback to someone on CC, they give each other Golden Chicken Awards. Isn't that sooooooo sweet?
- Mood:
bouncy
Posts:
6
12
19 (duh)
24
25 (notice how they post in a row? clever.)
29
36 (she posts a lot, doesn't she?)
38 (oopsie, she missed getting on the immediate coat tails of her fellow "chickie")
40
42 (better late than never, right?)
45
47
54
- Mood:
optimistic
Cool. Then you won't mind if I post members' names? How about the name of the message board? Oh, I know! How about if I post both of those things AND a list of the people you've been snarking on, along with those whose LJs you've been taking shit from and copying and pasting so you can all get your giggles in? You know the ones. The ones you pretend to be friends with when the only reason you friended them was so you could take shit from their LJs.
You might want to reign in some of your mouthier members or I'll do all of the above.
- Mood:
mischievous
Check out these threads and see if you can figure out who the mean girls are:
Confessions (read from, oh idk... maybe post 209 on)
Evicting our cat (post #s: 5, 6, 19, 20, 21, 40, 57, 63, 66, 68, 71, 78, 80, 82, 83, 88, 97)
Jon & Kate - ALL over it
Have fun sleuthing!
- Mood:
chipper
